Last updated
Versioning Strategy Comparison
- URL path (/v1/users) — most visible, easiest to implement, most widely used
- Query parameter (?version=1) — keeps base URL stable, easy to test in browser
- Header (API-Version: 1) — clean URLs, less visible, harder to test in browser
- Content negotiation (Accept: application/vnd.api.v1+json) — most RESTful, most complex
Use the API Versioning Helper at TechConverter.me to choose the right versioning strategy, generate consistent URL patterns, and plan your API's evolution without breaking existing clients.
Examples
Example 1: URL Path Versioning (Most Common)
Resource: users
Strategy: URL path versioning
Generated endpoints:
Version 1:
GET /api/v1/users
GET /api/v1/users/{id}
POST /api/v1/users
PUT /api/v1/users/{id}
DELETE /api/v1/users/{id}
Version 2 (breaking changes):
GET /api/v2/users
GET /api/v2/users/{id}
POST /api/v2/users
PATCH /api/v2/users/{id} ← changed from PUT to PATCH
DELETE /api/v2/users/{id}
Example 2: Header Versioning
Strategy: Custom header versioning
Request examples:
GET /users
API-Version: 1
GET /users
API-Version: 2
# Or using Accept header (content negotiation):
GET /users
Accept: application/vnd.myapi.v2+json
Example 3: Breaking vs. Non-Breaking Changes
NON-BREAKING changes (no new version needed):
✓ Adding a new optional field to a response
✓ Adding a new optional request parameter
✓ Adding a new endpoint
✓ Adding a new enum value (if clients handle unknown values)
✓ Relaxing validation (accepting more values)
✓ Adding new HTTP methods to existing resources
BREAKING changes (require a new version):
✗ Removing a field from a response
✗ Renaming a field
✗ Changing a field's data type (string → integer)
✗ Making an optional field required
✗ Changing URL structure
✗ Changing authentication method
✗ Changing error response format
✗ Removing an endpoint